Search This Blog

Tuesday, September 30, 2025

The Slithering Snake of America's Silent Tyrants

 By CE Marshall 


                       
                Hero of the Individual's Right to Live Unhindered by Government
                                                            Charlie Kirk 


     As I consider the frustrations regarding our government today, the daunting obstacles to restoring the American individual's voice keep surfacing in my mind. These obstacles are what have come to be like major parts of a snake, a silent tyrant, each of the parts of this tyrant are dependent on one another as they slither their way around our Democratic Republic- constricting and rendering the ordinary citizens powerless.   The parts of this snake are as follows;  

  

Number one- Of all the parts, this is most logically described as the "head" of the snake. The Federal Agencies who hold centralized power without being elected. This is very much to the advantage of Democrats because they are in favor of more government control.  Federal agencies are, well, them!   Government control is their modus operandi.  This explains why DC is 95% Democrat.    

Number two- The Lobbyists who use money to direct the nation’s law to their own specific need.  This is the biggest advantage to corporations who often require laws to do a lot of what they do at the expense of free competition in the marketplace. It is "freedom to petition the government" on steroids.  In their defense though, the government allows it and takes advantage of the relationship in many different ways.  I don't see how it benefits the people though. To petition the government should be from individual citizens or private groups not corporations and political action committees.     

Number three- The Elections, which require enormous amounts of money to render any candidate capable of being elected. This naturally encourages the parties to throw enormous amounts of money towards the individual they think can win the election, never mind if they are or are not qualified.  The end result is a candidate that the party wants but not necessarily one that is good for the country.  That aspect is of very little concern, especially to the Democrats because their “reason for being” is it to subjugate the individual anyway. Why would they care what the American people actually want or need?       

Number four- The political parties being the critical aspect of elections render two camps of thought in government – one always ruling over the other according to which party won.  This results in elected officials being in a position of tyranny in that the rights of the other side are ignored or subjugated.   Elected officials are supposed to be leading us all, not just those that agree with them, aren’t they?    This is much more terrifying under the Democrats because their willingness and glee to silence the individual is much easier with federal agencies and an army supporting them.      

Number five - The media and their tendency towards the left.  Why?  The virtue signaling of journalists is irresistible.  Also, the money is very good if you're at the top of the media pecking order.  In their mind they're saving the poor pathetic victims from the big bad rich people even though they are often the rich ones being discussed.   Of course, there are many different versions of this "we're the saviors" ideal, but you get the point.   They get to play "superman" for their audience no matter how untrue that might be.    Conservatives are becoming more alert to the situation, though.  Cable TV has Fox News and Newsmax, which are both conservative.  Online X, podcasts and other online news sources tend to be more moderate and/or conservative.   Newspapers?  They are becoming relegated to the ash heap of history because they’re nearly 100% to the left.   Most major newspapers such as the NYT and the Washington Post are so biased as to be laughable.  I only read the newspaper to get the jest of the liberal opinions on whatever topic is running through society this week.   For the media, the money and the need to feel virtuous is a lifelong addiction for the collective.  They are emotional parasites.  The Democrats still rule in this category although their power is waning.     

Number six - The court system ruling on matters of crime and punishment where the judge takes it upon himself to divvy up justice or lack of justice according to his or her emotions and his or her perception of social justice and inequality rather than the rule of law. They often favor the parasites over people who actually accomplish things and work hard.  Guess which party tends to rule in favor of social justice and sees the criminal as a victim and the victim as a villain?  The court system is the Democrat’s tool for enacting laws that the Republicans do not want by having a court rule something as a "law" such as was the case with the legalization of abortion.  No election required.  In addition, by not enforcing laws that Republicans support, they still get their way whether they were elected or not.  It’s also a wonderful source for the Democrats to feel virtuous for their “liberal” leanings- a lifelong addiction as mentioned above.  They get their way, one way or another.  It is the truest form of dictatorship in that it seeks to control justice in order for the dictator to feel better.  

    Number seven- Academia and its tendency towards the left – partly due to its dependency on a generous government and partly due to its allegiance to all thing's science – usually pitting “serious” matters to science and spiritual matters to being of no importance.  (Ironically most higher levels of education such as Harvard were begun as a type of seminary for studying God and His influence on science, not "Science as the God" where it lays today.) Academia is enshrined as the government’s lifelong lapdog because it is a fountainhead of cash and they are unlikely to disagree with anything the government dictates (by that I mean agencies not the elected officials). One very convenient example is global warming or climate change.  This is a tool for more government control.  So, for example, if you’re studying climate change you will find out quickly there is no money to test IF “climate change” is real but there’s plenty of money to prove it IS real and better yet, to elaborate on how the calamity is hovering over all of us unless we obey their latest edict.       

       As you can see, at the root of all of these snake parts there is one very common denominator, the Democrats.  The Democrats' aim is to get the government more power which quite naturally diminishes the power of the individual.  Money supports the head of the snake, the federal agencies, and that money comes from the American people and businesses.  It is their sly form of reallocation of wealth.  They then use the media to trumpet their philosophy.  At the same time corporations are beholden to federal agencies to stay in business so they play the game lest they get left out. The only topic that’s not totally the fault of the Democrats is, ironically, the political parties.  The Republicans are as guilty of abusing the power of the party as the Democrats.  The difference is the Republicans do work to instill personal rights of the individual such as speech, religion, and personal thought itself- the right to think for yourself and live a life you choose.  The pursuit of happiness.  Republicans can play dirty and flex their power, but they are much more tied to the reason for the existence of our country - the power of the individual and his or her absolute sanctity. We the People.  We are the sovereign of the United States just as King Charles is the sovereign of the United Kingdom.  Much to the chagrin of any pro-government philosophy, the individual is the ruler of America.  This is the secret of its power.  May it reign forever.  

  Follow me on X

Follow Me On Facebook


Wednesday, September 17, 2025

Truth Has Stumbled in the Public Square


 

It's been a week since Charlie Kirk was killed. I’m always giving my opinion - whether it’s wanted or not - but what to say? What do I say that reflects my thoughts on the matter at hand, the tragic murder of a brother in Christ who epitomized what I see as a good person- honest, brave, intelligent, and open minded? Then I came across this meme on social media & I thought - that’s what I’m feeling - when someone’s only crime is to speak their mind & to have an opinion & they’re killed for it & their political enemies celebrate it - then this is the same evil that killed Lincoln & Kennedy & MLK & yes even the Lord himself. Such courage. They all debated against those that hated them with passion, wit, intelligence all mixed with kindness and willingness to listen. They were speaking their opinion & questioning other opinions.

Open dialog. Debate. That’s what’s missing from media, corporate, government, entertainment & ESPECIALLY academia - there is no room for the other opinion. They hold the cards. Beating them at their game by questioning their lack of truth & logic is very dangerous. How can they say that climate change is "settled science" when it's not? How do I know it's not? Because anyone that questions it is silenced or ostracized. Your truth is not truth if it requires any disagreement to be refused the microphone. How can they say vaccines are totally safe when they're not. How do I know they're not? Because we have a government "by agency" that is for sale to the highest bidder and truth belongs to the deepest pockets. If there had always been open debate and discussion regarding the dangers of vaccinations instead of clandestine "studies" supported by the pharmaceuticals then I would think otherwise. How can they say the theory of evolution is not up for debate when it's still a theory and proving it is impossible given that mankind is incapable of time travel. How could you possibly "prove" it? In other words, any topic isn't "settled science" if questions regarding its veracity are refused or stifled. Such questions are not had in the public square because the left holds the microphone and has held if for a long time.

I really admire the courage Charlie Kirk had to speak up in these dark days of lies and deception. I will strive to be more like him. I will strive to speak without fear but only with certainty that I do not want to live a safe life while I watch my country dominated by silent tyrants dictating to all of us what truth is. "So justice is driven back, and righteousness stands at a distance; truth has stumbled in the streets, honesty cannot enter. Truth is nowhere to be found, and whoever shuns evil becomes a prey. The Lord looked and was displeased that there was no justice. He saw that there was no one, He was appalled that there was no intervention" Isaiah 59: Verse 14-16 NIV

Thank you, Charles James Kirk for being the one to intervene and Rest in Peace knowing that you fought the good fight for truth and justice in the public square.

Follow me on X

Follow Me On Facebook


Wednesday, September 10, 2025

Vaccine Debate is Welcome Relief

 By CE Marshall


     This past few week there has been more chatter than normal regarding the safety and necessity of vaccines.  I am not going to posture my position regarding the issue except to say it's a welcome sign of some civility in society that it's being debated at all.   Big Pharmaceuticals and their lapdog scientists have long feigned that "there is no debate" as if they and their way of thinking are the great "untouchables".  Are they incapable of making mistakes or errors in their functioning as corporations?  

     I am not leaping into the details of the safety of vaccines because I don't know.  I do know that until Secretary Kennedy became the Director of Health and Human Services there was no debate at all allowed regarding vaccines.  It was not even on the radar- and yet it's well known that a lot of people have died or become sick after taking vaccines, especially the COVID vaccines.  It's also a well-known fact that autism has taken a frightening increase over the last 30 years and the reason is not clear.  One factor that has changed is the injection of vaccines for infants that cover a multitude of diseases all at once.  Is that really safe?   I used to trust that our leaders and Doctors and scientists had our best interests at heart.  That is no longer true because money has become more important in their minds than the individual and his or her rights.  The collective of large government and large corporations are the priority today.  Is it wise to hand over a 100% of all disease prevention to a small group of Big Pharmaceuticals whose incentives and morality are suspect by anyone not involved?  Is it wise for our government agencies to have given "Carte Blanche" to these corporations to do whatever they please, that is, as long as they continue to "fund" government research studies and the politicians supporting their way of thinking? 

     Today Secretary Kennedy posted a "tweet" on X that stated the following:  

"Under this administration, vaccine injuries will be reported and studied. Individuals who suffer them will not be denied, marginalized, vilified or gaslit. They will be welcomed and we will learn everything that we can about them so that we can improve the safety of these products."

How can anyone argue with such a statement? It boggles my mind that Democrats- the "so-called" opponents of "big business" are so opposed to such measures that would scrutinize large corporations! It boggles my mind that their Senators and Representatives are so opposed to open debate regarding something all of us have been directed to have injected into our bodies and our children's bodies.


Follow me on X

Follow Me On Facebook

Wednesday, September 3, 2025

On Lies and Victimhood


                                                                 Fyodor Dostoevsky


Every once in a while, I'll run across a quote from a historic character that just bangs me over the head with its truth.  I'm reading "Crime and Punishment" by the Russian novelist Fyodor Dostoevsky.  The quote is not from that book, but I allude to the fact because he is on my mind and in my thoughts these days.  I really like his writing, it's descriptive and engaging and there's a wisdom there that's rarely found in modern literature, though maybe we will get back to such wisdom.  He lived from 1821 to 1881.  In this quote he speaks of men who lie to themselves and he elaborates on the pleasure of being insulted or "offended" as we would say today.  It's such a vapid, empty headed, egotistical thing to do.  There is no merit in it.  It reminds of the image of pigs wallowing in the mud, or a dog rolling around in it's own shit.  


"And above all, do not be so ashamed of yourself, for that is at the root of it all… You have known for a long time what you must do. You have sense enough: don't give way to drunkenness and incontinence of speech; don't give way to sensual lust; and, above all, to the love of money. And close your taverns. If you can't close all, at least two or three. And, above all—don't lie... Above all, don't lie to yourself. The man who lies to himself and listens to his own lie comes to such a pass that he cannot distinguish the truth within him, or around him, and so loses all respect for himself and for others. And having no respect he ceases to love, and in order to occupy and distract himself without love he gives way to passions and coarse pleasures, and sinks to bestiality in his vices, all from continual lying to other men and to himself.  The man who lies to himself can be more easily offended than anyone. You know it is sometimes very pleasant to take offense, isn't it? A man may know that nobody has insulted him, but that he has invented the insult for himself, has lied and exaggerated to make it picturesque, has caught at a word and made a mountain out of a molehill—he knows that himself, yet he will be the first to take offense, and will revel in his resentment till he feels great pleasure in it, and so pass to genuine vindictiveness."


Fyodor Dostoevsky- From "The Brothers Karamazov"

Follow me on X

Follow Me On Facebook