Thursday, December 13, 2018
By Chuck Marshall
*The essence of the first paragraph below was published in the Orlando Sentinel today.
It was headlined in the media that the United Nations has established a compact encouraging more orderly movement of migrants. Specifically, the Associated Press stated; "US Not Among 164 Nations to Back Migration Proposal". I don't pretend to know the details of what is being declared on this "nonbinding" compact., but I can certainly imagine it reduces any burden the United Nations might have to actually fix something. No, they won't go after abusive and oppressive governments to build up Democracy and/or free markets to encourage prosperity, but they sure have no problem telling "rich"nations that they need to start taking in more people who are looking for more "economic opportunities". After all, the "rich"nations are "aging"and we need young people from third world countries if we have any hope to survive.
I have a problem with this line of thinking.
1) I thought the United Nations was established to keep the peace not re-organize the world's economic wealth.
2) Shouldn't the "rich" nations be working on boosting their own populations and helping their own poor people rather than opening their borders in order to help incompetent governments go on governing ? By exporting their more desperate citizens they not only fail their citizens but they also dilute and distract from endeavors to successfully eliminate poverty in the rich nations.
3) How is opening the doors for citizens from failed governments and allowing them to go to successful nations doing anything other than dragging down the success of the existing successful governments ? Eventually, they too will be poor and the abject poverty and oppression of the failed country will move throughout the world like a cancer infecting all to the idea of poverty and want such that no corner of the world will be prosperous.
4) The idea that the only way citizens of poverty stricken countries can possibly succeed is if they move into wealthier "whiter" countries is highly bigoted in that it is implied that certain races are simply incapable of lifting themselves or their country out of poverty.
Wednesday, December 5, 2018
At least for the time being.
By Chuck Marshall
The sad news of President Bush senior passing away this past week has brought back memories to me. I was in high school when George was running in the primaries against Reagan. I supported Bush because I thought he had a better resume and seemed more moderate (of course - a moderate leaning American even in my days of youth !) . Of course, Reagan won because the country was anxious to get away from the near socialist government we lived under in the late 1970's and his folksy demeanor appealed more to middle America. Then Reagan chose Bush as his VP and I was suddenly a Reagan fan. Yes, at the start I liked Reagan because he chose Bush !
I voted for George Bush in his first election. It seemed appropriate given the success of Ronald Reagan that his VP should take over his successful Presidency. That was my thinking even though at the time he lacked the excitement of a great leader. George, at that time, had become familiar to all Americans and looking back he had become taken for granted. Maybe a little boring. But he won. Much in the news has been elaborating on the end of the Cold War and the Persian Gulf war that Bush presided over. This is all history and I think his handling of both episodes was exactly what we needed at the time. Calm, professional, patriotic, intelligent and understated diplomacy.
In his second election against Bill Clinton I found Bush to have evolved into a bit of an arrogant and detached windbag. At this time the Republican party began its departure from a moderate approach regarding protection of the environment towards an openly hostile attitude regarding all things green. "Tree huggers" became their scorn towards citizens like myself that think we're obligated to take care of the planet. George HW Bush was no exception, So, I voted for Bill Clinton. This is the only time I ever voted for a Democrat running for the Presidency.
In the end, George Bush Sr. was a gift to our country and mankind. He was a brilliant diplomat who lead our country with great clarity and decency. His accomplishment as a pilot in WWII is a remarkable story of youthful courage. His years after the presidency revealed a big heart for helping those who could not help themselves. His friendship with ex- president Bill Clinton under the auspice of helping victims of natural disasters was a wonderful example of American exceptionalism.
Well done George HW Bush you were sincerely a fine human being and our country was very fortunate to have you as a leader.