Search This Blog

Thursday, September 17, 2026

Collectivism VS Individualism

 By CE Marshall


                                                       
                                                                Me, The Individual 

Dear loyal readers, 

     I must confess a disdain for current events these days as it's not only depressing but it has little hope to offer.  It is a never- ending series of accusations and mostly hateful comments from one group of people to another.  There is fear to be had from the reader or watcher.  Doom scrolling is blood sport for most people- much like the Romans watched the gladiators bludgeon one another as they cheered them on.  

     So, this is a problem as a blog writer that counts on current events to spur passion for one thing or another.  This is why my blog has been so quiet this year, some of that due to a dog bite that distracted me, personal work that has kept me busy, a large yard and property that never seems to stop sprouting weeds, and a personal writing ambition to finally get my book published- even if it's on the "pseudo" publishing route that is Kindle Direct Publishing.  So, the book is finally published - there is a link at the end of this blog if you're interested in buying it.    Now, I'm back in the mood to write in this blog. "An American Voice" continues.  

    Now I am in the mindset that "I have to write another blog", but about what since I'm not fully ingrained into the "flavor of the month"?  I suppose today- September of 2026 -the flavor appears to be the lady that murdered her kids "Clancy" and the determination of the left to see her declared innocent because she was in a state of insanity.  I'm not going to get into that today, but I probably will in a future blog.  One quick comment though- Isn't any person that murders another person insane to one degree or another?   

    Here I am - I've finished a book with my concepts of what ails the American people and possible solutions.  I got it off my chest, so to speak.  I now consider some of my own ideas of what government should be for the betterment of mankind.  To begin with I feel it's important we classify things as something other than Democrat or Republican, Left or Right because these concepts are old and moldy and can very easily be manipulated by the Silent Tyrants and Mad King George (maybe I should start saying "Mad King Media"?).  What I think would be best, and of the most benefit to the people, is to distinguish the work of the government and its focus.  Is the candidate or group more interested in collectivism or individualism?  Such a distinction is important because it has not been defined as such before.  We live in a world now, where most of the large corporations lean to the left and support more "liberal" policies, so long as you don't touch their money and power, of course.  This need to have control and this need to dictate to the people how they should behave and react to the situations of life is a very "collectivist" thought.  The same can be said of oppressive and dictatorial governments and groups- they want to control the people and dictate reactions.  This not only gives them more power, but it enables more aggressive tactics to keep things in order and according to their liking, even if it means lying, stealing, arresting and even killing - as we saw with Hitler and Stalin.  Just like the large corporations, the large government is addicted to power and control, and the individual is of the very least importance.  Today the Silent Tyrants use the gullible to suggest they have a bigger heart and are "better" people by tickling their "virtue bone" with thoughts of a utopia where all is made equal and they can go on being irresponsible, lazy, and uneducated about their government, history and the world.  In the mind of the "useful idiots" is the thought that they are fixing the world by allowing those in power to control everything since they said on their political campaign that they would make it all better by reallocating from the "haves" to the "have nots".  The last thing the Collectivists want is for the people to become educated as to the reality of their track record.  

My best to you all for a happy fall season!  

  Amazon.com: An American Voice : The Silent Tyrants eBook : Marshall, CE, Marshall, Charles: Kindle Store



 




Friday, August 21, 2026

The Silent Tyrants- "the book" - Introduction

 

**Note loyal readers!  "The Silent Tyrants" in now availalable in its entirety on Kindle and soon paperback!   

Amazon.com: An American Voice : The Silent Tyrants eBook : Marshall, CE, Marshall, Charles: Kindle Store


The Silent Tyrants

By CE Marshall

Introduction.


“Perhaps the sentiments contained in the following pages are not sufficiently fashionable to procure them general favor; a long habit of not thinking a thing wrong,  gives it a superficial appearance of being right, and raises at first a formidable outcry in deference of custom.  But tumult soon subsides.  Time makes more converts than reason”.  

Thomas Paine from “Common Sense” 1776

                                                   

     These are the words at the very beginning of Thomas Paine’s masterpiece, “Common Sense”, the most significant piece of literature in regard to the catalysts behind the American Revolution.   Paine argued very effectively for a clear and definite separation from the United Kingdom and a Declaration of Independence.  Our forefathers fought a Revolution and won.  Later they met and established a constitution enabling the people with the power to rule through the world's first true Democratic Republic.  Is it time for another constitutional convention to reign in a government and society that has forgotten the people?  A convention to reign in the “powers that be” in our government and society; our largest corporations, powerful lobbyists, courts that legislate, special interests, and a bloated and ineffective government that squanders our money for the sake of reelecting themselves and maintaining the power of the federal agencies- America’s untouchables.  We are all being robbed— rich, poor, religious, atheist, black, white, Latino, left and right by treasonous leaders with suspicious allegiance to whoever helped them get where they are and a media with a vested interest in a never- ending battle between the parties.  Everyone is being mugged.  All these powers will continue to steal our liberty because the American people are not exercising their muscles of citizenship.  Remember it is “We the people” here in America according to the very first words of our constitution.  It isn’t “we the corporations”, or “we the lobbyists”, or “we the government that knows better” or “we the media”.   These groups are slowly but surely replacing people as the sovereign of our nation.   In fact, it would be easy to argue that this has already happened. 

     It isn’t just new ideas that scare your ordinary person.  The problem with any new idea and way of looking at things is that the “powers that be” would be adamantly opposed to most solutions because most solutions would take away some of their power and they run the risk of no longer being a “power that is” to being a “power that once was”.   We as a people must be ready to stand up to the normal way of thinking and be prepared to understand and assume we will be opposed., no matter how wonderful the idea might be to us.  Imagine the British parliament and King George being excited that the American colonies were looking at independence.  Imagine the Pope being inspired that Martin Luther posted a list of protests on that church door in Germany back in 1517 and declared the Roman Catholic Church and its hold on power throughout Europe to be a fraud.  Imagine wealthiest slave owners of the American south feeling open and agreeable to freeing their slaves so that the African people could be free humans – never mind that their wealth would quickly vanish along with said slaves.  These proposals will be adamantly opposed by most of the “powers that be”; the federal agencies, the media, the political parties, the federal government industrial complex, the defense industry, the pharmaceutical industry, the chemical industry and the energy industry to name just a few.   They will be opposed to these ideas the moment these concepts congeal in their heads.  What I’m proposing is to take their power away and give it back to the people where it belongs.   

          I am a regular middle class American.  I have no formal education regarding government, other than the usual requirements of the modern Bachelor’s Degree.   I have a degree in Business Administration from the University of Florida and I work in the horticulture industry as a sales manager.  I work very hard and I want the best for my family, my community, and my country.   The differences between the reader and myself might be that I love to write, I have a passion for history,  and any kind of waste tends to send me over the edge.   These three things have mixed together in me creating a stew of frustration and anger as well as hope and optimism that has bubbled up to induce the book you hold in your hands (or read on your phone/tablet). 

     The idea behind this book is two-fold.   First, we must expose the most pressing issues of the American government and define what the problems are.  Second, we need to imagine what could be accomplished with a government freed of its bloated tendencies and poised in the direction of enhancing the lives of all citizens not just for the rich, the poor, the most fashionable victim, or the moneyed special interests.   

       The federal government supports the poor through programs such as Medicaid, welfare, food stamps, government housing and a various agencies designed to assist them in their poverty.  While I applaud the intentions to help those in need their “track record” is hardly impressive.  After decades of redistributing wealth to those in need, there is still poverty, drug addiction, violence and an absolute loss of hope by the citizens of American ghettos.  To say the spending of hundreds of billions of dollars over the last century has been at all helpful would be a farce, but I have no doubt those politicians that instigated the whole idea made off with a hefty share of the redistributed wealth.  Indeed, both parties have been especially adept at spending our money.  Much of it ends up on their estates back home or in their townhouses and the taverns of Georgetown, Washington DC.  The federal government also swings open the door of influence to the large corporations and their lobbyists who slither throughout Washington coiling around any and all legislation such that it benefits them the most.  We let them get away with it.  The media lets them get away with it (and probably benefits from it as well).  What of the backbone of the nation, the middle class- the tradesman, the artisan, or small business?   How is the government breathing health and stability in the vertebrae of America?    The answer is that they don’t, and all their efforts are a never-ending battle between the two parties jockeying for power within the government –each with its opposite view of the role of government.  The middle is usually forgotten the minute elections are over.   Yes, they pay lip service to us but usually they simply tell us what they think we want to hear.  It’s all about “what the American people want”, but in reality it’s all about what they want and what their party wants.  The real needs of the everyday citizen are an afterthought. 

     The noblest of people are those that work to feed their family while working in their chosen field of interest; the passions of the common man are the fountain of all human progress.  This can be seen in all significant human accomplishments.  It is not the efforts and accomplishments of large organizations but those of the person.   It is not the directives from large government or bureaucracies but the inventiveness and creativity of the people in the trenches with the true understanding of the obstacles to be overcome. 

     As an Independent minded citizen who has contempt for both major parties I see myself as a “Free Thinker”.  Admittedly I am a registered Republican because the state of Florida requires I choose a party for my voice to be heard.  That is one big reason I am in favor of “open primaries” so Independent voters can vote in the primary elections.    My heart is with moderate, intelligent, passionate Americans who want to see a government for all the people, not just one side or the other.  It is outrageous how much has been lost to the parties.  George Washington himself warned of the dangers of political parties, yet here we sit.  Both left and right leaning thought have ideas worth discussing but neither has the corner on common sense.   The idea of compromise is so important to get anything done because you’ll always have opposing views.  The intelligence and wisdom of middle thinkers is what’s missing today.  They have no voice.  I hope this book can begin to give it to them.   We can no longer trust the parties to run our government effectively.  They cannot serve the people when they consistently fail to get past disagreements and refuse to compromise or think logically.   So, through this book I endeavor to offer solutions and ideas to move things forward.   We owe it to our ancestors that have fought and struggled to bring the power to the people.  We cannot let their memory be dirtied by enabling this rich, powerful and an incompetent government of buffoons.   Too much has been sacrificed, too much blood has been spilled to let this great experiment in a Republican Democracy go to extinction.   We owe it also to our children and our posterity.  We owe them a wise, sage, efficient, effective government that enables all people and boosts the morale and inventive nature of all mankind to rise to the level that the Almighty had intended in the first place. 

                                       


                                                                    Abraham Lincoln

     In a sense we are engaged in a civil war today, in 21st century America with the left vs right, liberal vs conservative, Democrat VS Republican.  Lincoln’s famous speech beseeches us to gird ourselves for a fight to maintain the American voice as the one sovereign voice of America.  To fight like the men did on the battlefields of history.  To fight to the death if need be.

In his famous speech after the battle of Gettysburg Lincoln outlined the point here in his comments dedicating the cemetery that would hold the 7000 men killed in the bloodiest battle of American history.  It is for us the living.  

      “But, in a larger sense, we cannot dedicate-we cannot consecrate- we cannot hallow-this ground.  The brave men, living and dead, who struggled here, have consecrated it far above our poor power to add or detract.  The world will little note, nor long remember what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here. It is for us the living, rather, to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced. It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us—that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion—that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain—that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom—and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.”

Abraham Lincoln, The Gettysburg Address November, 1863

 

          Lincoln is referring to each individual human who is capable of beauty and eloquence and creativity such that the world should applaud all 7 billion of us.   We cannot let the deaths of nearly a million American war dead in our history and as many maimed and crippled- to have been in vain.  They were not fighting for Kings or Queens or an autocratic government, they were fighting for you and me.  Right here, right now.   They were fighting for an idea that every human being has merit and Hs something to offer the world. 

     I am going to do my best to keep this book simple and straight to the point while hopefully also being eloquent and powerful.  I have read historic accounts of government and find them to be a crushing bore.  There is one big exception; “Common Sense”, by Thomas Paine.    Thomas Paine was arguing against the King and the monarchy while I’ll be arguing the case against the way things are done today and those that have the real power in modern society who are vested in keeping things incompetent because that incompetence is very much to their benefit.   I have labeled them the “Silent Tyrants” because they feign ignorance when you point out their unfair advantages and they are totally quiet as they rob, cheat and swindle the decent citizens of our country through their avarice, greed and appalling selfishness.

     I won’t present these problems without solutions.  The last thing we all need is another book that understands we’re all drowning but gets stuck describing the water.  The problems are many; national debt, crushing poverty, infrastructure concerns, unorganized immigration, corporate greed, pollution, biased media, bloated government, fraud and even treason against our country.  The list could easily go on.  I’d like this book to focus on what would be the most help to all Americans and even all the world;  An American government of competent citizens that are concerned for their constituents above all else.  That is the individual citizen.  Not the Democrats, the Republicans, the Independents, or the Libertarians.   

     Through a commonality of concern for all of us, our concerns as humans, I hope we can look at problems objectively and with urgency.   We can come together and establish reasonable strategies for fixing the problems at hand through an intelligent government matched with private enterprise.   I believe there’s nothing that we can’t solve.   In addition, although I’m very suspicious of powerful government, I do feel a wise government need not be such an impossible concept.  On the contrary I think the government can do a great deal of good if it’s set up with certain constraints and is run by leaders not politicians and bureaucrats




Saturday, July 4, 2026

Happy 250th Independence Day to the USA

 By CEMarshall 


                                                            Happy Independence Day !   

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”

Great words of our founding fathers declaring independence (an act that could easily have gotten them all hung for insurrection against the King of England) It’s worth pointing out that this idea was nonexistent in 1776. The world lived under tyranny of one form or another. Underneath all the words was this: Limited government & more power to the individual. No kings, no tyrants, no forced re-distribution of wealth, no government ordained success according to your sex or race, no forced military participation, no forced patriotism, and no political parties if you choose none. You, your lungs, your heart, & your endeavors. As it should be, and should always be so help us God.

Have a great one everybody!!

**Note loyal readers!  "The Silent Tyrants" in now availalable in its entirety on Kindle and soon paperback!   

Amazon.com: An American Voice : The Silent Tyrants eBook : Marshall, CE, Marshall, Charles: Kindle Store




Sunday, June 14, 2026

The World's First Trillionaire

 By CE Marshall 

                                            The World's First Trillionaire 


     There's a lot of talk on the internet and in the news regarding Elon Musk becoming the world's first trillionaire.  It's interesting to see who thinks what regarding this new thing we have here.  A trillionaire- is hard to get your mind around.   A Trillion dollars is a million- million.  And he has over 1.1 Trillion !  The left sees this as unfair.  The right sees this as something to be admired- even celebrated.   

     I'm not going to get into pinpointing the exact person who said what.  It's the usual people on the left who are outraged by a mathematical fact.  I find them puzzling, though.  Who are you to decide what's unfair for one man to earn from his own efforts?  Musk has created enormous wealth and vast numbers of jobs (seemingly high-paying jobs) by endeavoring to build his dream and better mankind through electric cars and exploring space technology.  How is that bad?   He arrived here in the United States with nearly nothing.  Through his own ingenuity and hard work, he created a personal wealth that may never be equaled.  

     It is the mind of a child that sees this as unfair.  Only a child would not understand he didn't take the money from anyone.  It sprang from his efforts.   The US federal government, our state governments, and most all governments on the planet are the opposite.  They seize wealth and waste it on nonsense and throw it away on ideas to supposedly "help" people, to go to war, and to redistribute assets according to their version of social justice.  They create entire bureaucracies to solve problems where solving the problem is actually the least of their intentions.   They solve no problems because that would end their jobs.   If there's a true thief in our modern world it's the government- and there are very few governments and or leaders who are innocent of this accusation.  

      So, I celebrate the newfound ultra wealth of Elon Musk.  Congratulations and keep up your magnificent work.  This is the only true way to elevate mankind, by not hindering the efforts of the individual.  The thoughts and words of the left and Democrat leaders regarding this matter are nothing more than envy.  They are the ones that bring us all down by encouraging envy through their empty headed and vacuous voters.       

**Note loyal readers!  "The Silent Tyrants" in now availalable in its entirety on Kindle and soon paperback!   

Amazon.com: An American Voice : The Silent Tyrants eBook : Marshall, CE, Marshall, Charles: Kindle Store

Follow me on X

Follow Me On Facebook


Monday, May 25, 2026

Remembering those We Never Knew But Wish We had

 

By Charles Eldridge Marshall 


                                                              

                                                      Lt. Robert Marshall  


Memorial Day 2026 

I first posted this in 2024 - but it always seems fitting and maybe I'll repeat it again every year as a tradition.  The Memorial of today is to the young people who lost their lives before they even started.  This is my second cousin - my father's first cousin- lost in WW II - his face is so young and filled with the expectancy of a full life of weddings and children and grandchildren and birthdays and holidays and achievement. That's what was lost on the battlefield- a life not lived.  RIP Robert Marshall,  I wish I had known you.  

Original Post 
  I found this picture a few years ago in my grandmother’s old photo album- Lt. Robert Marshall - she remarked "My Nephew Lt. Robert Marshall, lost in action in 1943. Pictures taken while a cadet at LSU - La." He was “lost” in action - so I assume killed - but she doesn’t say anything about where or how, and my father never mentioned this cousin. I often think about him- he’s so young with a lifetime ahead of him. A big smile with the hopes of any young man at that age. Consider those lives lost & the huge price they paid. Defeating the Nazis & Fascist Japan was the high-point of our history in my humble opinion. On this Memorial Day I remember Lt. Robert Marshall. Lost to the world in WWII.

Rest in Peace, my dear cousin

**Note loyal readers!  "The Silent Tyrants" in now availalable in its entirety on Kindle and soon paperback!   

Amazon.com: An American Voice : The Silent Tyrants eBook : Marshall, CE, Marshall, Charles: Kindle Store

Saturday, May 16, 2026

Tyrants of Thought

 By CE Marshall

  DON'T EVEN THINK IT 

Dear Readers-- if you follow me on a regular basis then I apologize for my absence.   My last post was on February 16th regarding the Save America Act (which sadly, is still stuck in the Senate) To explain,  I'm in the plant business and Spring is a very busy time for me- not to mention on April 1  I was bitten by a pit bull (and that ain't no April Fools joke!).  That has taken quite a bit of my attention and occupied my mind.  That entire fiasco will be addressed in a future blog (I think.  It depends if the mood strikes me to review the entire episode). As of right now the saga is still not really over but I do feel I've rounded the curve to the finish line.  

     Today this title- "Tyrants of Thought" popped in my head and I thought to myself "that would be a great title to one of my blogs", so here I am!  What will this be about, I'm not totally sure- but I guess we'll find out shortly.  By the way I am working on a book- titled "An American Voice" or "A Voice of Reason"- I haven't made up my mind.  Maybe another title?  "Tyrants of Thought"?   It will be an elaboration on some of my humble opinions regarding ways to fix our broken, blubbery, fat, ineffective government.  My intention is to have it published an Amazon Publishing and posted with links to purchase here on my blog that you're reading right now.  My goal was to have it published by my daughter's birthday, May 5, but because of the dog bite that idea went off the rails.  Now, my goal is July 4 on time for the USA's 250th birthday.  

     Who are the Tyrants of Thought?    If you've read this blog you know that I refer to the "powers that be" here in the early 21st Century as "The Silent Tyrants" and also on occasion "Mad King George" to refer to the dictators that rule us through media and big government and academia and global corporations (as well as domestic corporations, they surely are not innocent!).  They are all complicit in controlling us and our thoughts, however in particular, the rulers of media, the press, and academia are the vectors of tyrannical thought where their ideas and ways of seeing things are sacrosanct and anything contrary is blasphemous or heresy to the "new world order" that they have been working on so hard and for so long.  Tyrants of thought are not only in these groups, they're in the schools and the churches and everywhere that people gather and move forward to act as a group.  These people tend to be more the minions of the "tyrants of thoughts" and are not where the tyrannical thoughts spring forth from. They are, however, just as dangerous to you and me because they are the "useful idiots" that the tyrants instruct to do their bidding.  They don't think for themselves, and they run on passion and emotion rather than rational thought and common sense.  

     An example of "TOT" (Tyrants of Thought) would be Trump Derangement Syndrome at the local level where the minions have been instructed and are obeying the edicts of the corporate media and the globalists to hate Donald Trump.  The rationale is that he's dictator and a Nazi or a King, etc.... whereas the fact that they are able to say such things on the street corner with no fear of retribution is evidence that he actually is not.  It also is an example of their lack of understanding of our government and how it works- no one person can get his or her way as President.  That would not be true if we had the absolute government that they crave controlling everything.  That is true dictatorship as what we saw in Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union.   The irony is they are the very people that would enable our government to such power and use its power to encroach on the rights of their neighbors.  This we saw during the COVID pandemic with elaborate fanfare as citizens told on their neighbors for having more than 5 visitors or people were denied visitation to dying family members.  

In my humble opinion, here is a list of the thoughts that tyrannical leaders through various methods, are ruling us and intimidating all of us to think and to not question.  If something is not up for debate or is "settled science" then it is more than likely a tyrannical thought that springs from someone who benefits that we all think the way the want us to think.   On this list, many are such a part of the Silent Tyrants' agenda, that if you don't agree with them then their minions will defriend you off Facebook, etc...  and you are not to be addressed again. You are "persona non grata" as the Latin saying goes.  

The Edicts of the Thought Tyrants 

1) Donald Trump is an insane tyrant.  

2)  Climate Change is real. 

3)  All vaccines are good and are completely safe.  

4)  People are born gay; they don't choose to be gay. 

5)  People who identify as the opposite sex are totally sane and should be encouraged and enabled to do so. 

6) The universe is billions of years old. 

7)  The Theory of Evolution is fact, not theory. 

8)  All physical reality can be explained through science, if scientists don't have the answer now, they will eventually. 

9)  The Holy Bible is to be interpreted according to how you feel about what it's saying and obedience to it relies on whether you agree with it or not.  

10)  You have to get more education in order to be a fulfilled as a human being, no matter how useless what you study is. 

11) The sexes are equal to each other, and each is just as capable of doing anything as the other. 

12)  White people and/or males are responsible for most of the bad things that happen in the world today. 

13) Diversity of people is always a good thing.  

14)  Diversity of thought is never a good thing.  

15)  Emotions are much more important than the logical reality of any situation. 

16)  Any problem can be solved if you hand it over to federal agencies, or the Universities for examination along with lots and lots of money to "study" the issue. 


In the mind of the "statists" or the "thought tyrants" there is no debate to be had with any of these issues.  These are all "settled science".  

In My Humble Opinion.....

Follow me on X

Follow Me On Facebook


Monday, February 16, 2026

Voting Rights and the Save Act

 By CE Marshall


     Dear readers-  I apologize for my long absence.  Normal life has been calling and keeping me busy but, alas, a current event demands my commentary.  I have been following the "Save Act" which is a federal law in the works to require proof of citizenship for all voters and also instills several measures to prevent voting fraud.  The name comes from the urgency expressed by the Republican party that any other choice will end up in the ruin of our Republic- as is the case for nearly every law/election for the last 20 years- as expressed by both parties' leaders.  It does grow tiresome.   However, I do support the Save Act but I'm not sure it's doom and gloom if it does not pass.  I do think the Democrats are painting themselves into a corner with their absolute opposition to the Save Act.  Have they actually been cheating?  

What's good about the Save Act;

1)  This ensures American voters are represented by leaders they elect not by leaders who are beholden to illegal immigrants that have entered our country outside the boundaries of established law. Statistics bear out that a large percentage of "undocumented" immigrants take government assistance so the motivation to vote and keep Democrats in power would be quite strong. 

2)  Illegal votes- whether from undocumented immigrants or through ballot stuffing and other nefarious means to "cheat" the system should be obviously wrong to anyone interested in fair elections. It's self-evident, isn't it?  

3)  The suspicion that the Democrats cheated in the 2020 election only grows and any and all methods to assure the public that elections are fair and lawful is essential. 

4)  The courts have proven themselves to be either complicit in enabling Democrat success with questionable voting laws (or lack thereof) or they are afraid to make a stand for fear of over-stepping their power.  There have been some rulings that should help "somewhat" in preventing more 2020 types of voting theft.  One ruling, by the supreme court does support efforts to strictly limit voting after election day.  But such rulings do not go far enough.  We need a law to give the situation teeth. 

5)  The Democrats claim this would prevent people from voting, but I don't see how that would be.  We all have to get ID's to drive and we all need Birth Certificates to confirm who we are in many instances.   One concern I've seen on X is that this will prevent women who have married and had their name changed from voting!   A marriage certificate should nip that issue in the bud- it's somewhat frightening that the Democrat leadership has such very little confidence - or they're lying- that females have no common sense to understand the situation.  Unfortunately, they are somewhat correct though in that assessment of the thinking abilities of enraged liberal women.  

6)  The left feigns great concern at the voting rights of American minorities and screams "racism".  The greater concern should be the loss of confidence that all law-abiding Americans have that their vote is being diluted by illegal votes and widespread cheating.  These are the true victims.  

     The Save Act seems a good thing in my humble opinion and should be passed.  The vote will be tight, and they would have to break the tradition of filibuster that requires 60-40 votes in the Senate to pass an Act.  It may be necessary, given that if the Democrats don't have any concern about cheating during elections, then they would have no problem breaking the filibuster themselves given the chance.  In addition, it would appear they may actually be a part of the cheating, at least at the local level in Democrat states and cities such as California and Atlanta.   The days of bi-partisan acts are gone, I'm afraid.  All opportunities to cheat during elections, even the appearance of cheating, must be halted  

**Note loyal readers!  "The Silent Tyrants" in now availalable in its entirety on Kindle and soon paperback!   

Amazon.com: An American Voice : The Silent Tyrants eBook : Marshall, CE, Marshall, Charles: Kindle Store

Follow Me On Facebook



Thursday, January 8, 2026

The Arrest of Maduro

 By CE Marshall

                                                        Dictator Nicolas Maduro of Venezuela 

     Much in the news this week is the capture and arrest of the dictator, Maduro, of Venezuela.  The Venezuelans of the world seem very happy about it and most of Latin America seems to be in agreement that this is a good thing.  As I write he is sitting in a prison in New York awaiting trial for drug trafficking and other various offenses to humanity.  We shall see what happens, of course, but the effect on the world political screenplay, as it were, is substantial.  

     When I awoke to the news that splashed across my cell phone, I shook my head and thought to myself "only Trump" because it is true that we have never had such an audacious President, certainly not in my lifetime.  The left-leaning public is opposed to it as they are opposed to anything Donald Trump does.  The far-left media - most mainstream media- is highly critical and clicking its tongues that "this action is outside of the law", their favorite line when something doesn't go their way or cannot be credited to one of their allies.  Considering that Joe Biden had a $25 million dollar bounty on Maduro's head, this is abject hypocrisy (the heartbeat of liberal or statist ideals).  It is a huge stretch to criticize the action too much, but the Democrats have nothing else to offer us these days but vitriol and sanctimony.  "It was a superb success, but we don't like it because Trump is behind it" is what they really mean.  

     There is work to be done in Venezuela as the United States' powerful navy proceeds to choke Venezuela's only means of income, oil.   This hurts the people, but the effectiveness of an embargo against an oppressive government is not clear in this case.  We've been shutting out Cuba from most world trade for decades and all that has done has been to hurt the regular Cuban citizen.   I hear rumors of starvation and no electricity through my Cuban-born wife.  Cuba is in such bad shape even Trump has shrugged his shoulders that the country will probably fall within itself.  This is the consequence of over sixty years of oppression and a government that has no concern but for itself, as do all Communist and most Socialist governments.   The leaders of Cuba still trade and benefit by dealing with the Iran's and Hezbollah's of the world, but the people starve and suffer.  Now that Venezuela can no longer help them and China is quite a distance away, it does not look good for the leadership of Cuba.  

     So, given that Maduro lost an election but refused to give up power, I see this as justice for the people of Venezuela.  Establishing a strong Democratic Republic is not an easy thing when the people are weakened and starving by their own government, and Venezuela is still very much under the grip of oppression.  But it is a good thing to try.   Our country is established under a constitution that begins "We the People" and it was built on the foundation of Christian values that empower the individual to live free and be allowed to pursue happiness as God permits.  May we proceed with the good fight to liberate Venezuela and all countries of the Western Hemisphere because it's the decent thing to do.  Even if it's not totally "legal".  Why should we help them?  Consider it paying forward the favor done for us in our Revolution against Britain 250 years ago.  France stepped up to help the United States, and we would not have won our independence but for our French allies.    It is the right thing to do.  


Follow me on X

Follow Me On Facebook



Thursday, December 18, 2025

Century of Lies

 By CE Marshall 

     


     Lately I've been thinking about how much "We the people" are lied to by the government and by society.  It also occurred to me that would make a great blog, so here I am! 

     Most of the lies have occurred at a blossoming rate over the last century.  I have no doubt that lying has been a "beefy" business for a long time (certainly throughout history), but I do think at the height of American Liberty- in the early 19th century- the American people had quite a bit of power and the lies were much more difficult to conceal or get away with.  In those years- 1800 to 1850 the American public seemed to understand their government and what was required of them to keep it in check- and the government had not had time to morph into the obscene untouchable federal bureaucracy that it is today.  The Civil War, with all the good it did, was also the birth of a powerful federal government that within 100 years morphed into what it is today- a government willing to murder the President if he threatens the bureaucracy.  It's as if the American public became "high" on the power and wealth of our country and it became less urgent to spend a lot of time and energy on what the government is really doing.  Today, of course, it's a behemoth with no account to anyone other than itself.  It squanders money and is thick with waste and fraud.

     The waste and fraud are their own topic.  What I want to explore is what I consider the biggest lies of all.  It's not just on the government.  It's also on the media, academia, Hollywood, and the ruling elite- the "Silent Tyrants" that I bring up with some frequency.  The "birthing mothers", as it were.  I will say, however, that for each and every single lie, the lie springs from the government in one way or another.  "It goes without saying" in other words.  As Thomas Paine put it- "society in every state is a blessing, but the government even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one"  

So here it is; Chuck Marshall's Humble Opinion regarding the biggest lies of the last century.  I have listed 12 so we'll call them the "Dirty Dozen".  

The Dirty Dozen Lies of the Last Century   

1)    Today- "Global Warming- AKA Climate Change is an existential threat to humanity."  Florida should be under water right now.  Culprit: Al Gore, the Democrat Party, Academia, the American left.   Control through fear. 

2)   Today- "Gender is interchangeable and is a function of the mind not biological.  Consequently, it can be altered by surgery and drugs without any consequences to the patient."  Culprit:  Academia, Pharmaceuticals, Medical establishment, American Bureaucracy.  Scientists are there to correct God's mistake- because they are God.  Also, there's a lot of money to be made.  

3)  Early 1930's- "Josef Stalin and the Soviet Union are an example of how successful communism can be if it's done correctly."  The editor of the New York Times famously went to the Soviet Union and saw the evidence of widespread, orchestrated starvation caused by Stalin himself- mostly in the Ukraine-to control that country's tendency to rebel.  The NTY editor chose to ignore what he could see with his own eyes.  Millions died because the "Intellectuals" of the United States and Europe looked away.  Culprit:  The New York Times, Academia, American and European Leftists.  The never-ending infatuation that the left has with royals and tyrants.  (I always read the New York Times thinking about this fact- they have so much blood on their hands and not one ounce of regret.)  

4)  Late 1930's- "Adolf Hitler wants peace above all else.  All that's necessary is to sign over German speaking parts of Czechoslovakia." Culprit:  UK Neville Chamberlain and the blithering idiots of the leftist English and French governments.  We all know what happened with Hitler.  He most definitely did not want peace.  

5)  Early 20th Century- "Income Tax is a fair tool for running modern society.  Redistribution is efficient and effective and fair."  No! It is the least efficient form of taxation- by far.  Culprit:  Woodrow Wilson, American Liberals.  A lot of Economists seem to understand graphs much more than they understand people. 

6) The 1960's - "If Vietnam falls the world will be a domino of falling countries to Communism."  Vietnam fell and quite the opposite happened.  Culprit:  Lydon Johnson, Richard Nixon, US Government, US Military Complex.  War can be very profitable for a lot of people if they keep their mouth shut.  

7)  The 1960's- "JFK was killed by Lee Harvey Oswald."  No, he wasn't.  Culprit: The Warren Report, and multiple government agencies protecting each other.  Our government killed our President.  There, I said it.    

8)  The 1950's - "Fidel Castro will be good for Cuba and its people."  Cuba went from one of the wealthiest to one of the poorest countries in the western hemisphere in about 20 years.  Culprit:  American media, Hollywood, the Trudeaus of Canada, Barbara Walters (American journalist).  Same as the Soviet Union above; "The never-ending infatuation that the left has with royals and tyrants".  

9)  The 1980's "The Big Bang Theory is a viable explanation to how all creation appeared." It's laughable- order from disorder?  What "causes" the order then?  Culprit:  Academia, Fawning American pop culture.  It's so absurd that nobody questioned it, if that makes sense?  If you're going to lie, make it a big lie.  

10) The Early 20th Century- "Evolution is an explanation to all that is living on the planet today."  You can drive a Mack truck through the Theory of Evolution and it's many, many holes that scientists assure us will one day be filled by them, of course.  Culprit:  Academia and Fawning American pop culture.  Once again, the scientist has to be the God that explains it all, there's no room for anything bigger than his or her brain.  

11)  "The people elect their government in the United States."  The Reality: The American government is a government of agencies and bureaucrats with special privilege.  They are at the front of the line to feast at the pig-trough of American dollars.  Culprit: The American people for allowing it to happen.  Elected officials come and go, but the bureaucrats stay forever.  

12)  "Separation of Church and State is in the Constitution and/or is an essential part of the American government."  No, it's not.  Culprit:  American media, academia, leftists.  We're guaranteed freedom of religion, but it is never mentioned that the government can have no part in religion.  The foundations of western civilization are based on Judeo-Christian values and morals.  

In future blogs I endeavor to explore each lie and dissect my reasoning and perhaps share some ideas to correct the lies so that our posterity will not have to endure the vomit that comes out of Washington, DC and the Silent Tyrants that rule us. 

**Note loyal readers!  "The Silent Tyrants" in now availalable in its entirety on Kindle and soon paperback!   

Amazon.com: An American Voice : The Silent Tyrants eBook : Marshall, CE, Marshall, Charles: Kindle Store


Follow me on X

Follow Me On Facebook


Thursday, November 6, 2025

Government Shutdown is Government Failure

 By CE Marshall


                                                                The Parties Must Go 

     Once again, we see the two parties are incapable of coming to any sort of agreement.  They are like petulant children that need a very good spanking.  This most current shutdown is the longest in history, so now it becomes one more example of how bad government has gotten and the fact that it's not getting better.  I throw my hands up on this one, but I must say that the people voted for Trump and the Republicans so if we are truly living in a Democratic Republic then the Democrats need to plead their case to the people in the next round of elections not by stalling the process of legislation.  They seem to be at the will of their more extreme supporters who are focused only on hating Trump and it is working somewhat as the recent elections have shown.  It pays to block the other party, and that is at the core of our most current shutdown.  Anyway, once again the people "all the people" are the last of anyone's concern and it's all about posturing and politics.  The parties need to go- I'm not sure how that would look or how this could be maneuvered, but I believe that's the only solution.  Their only reason for existing is to stop each other, which means they're stopping half the population from being governed at the consent of the people.  Government shutdown is not the consent of the people it's the consent of obstructionists.    

In My Humble Opinion.....      

**Note loyal readers!  "The Silent Tyrants" in now availalable in its entirety on Kindle and soon paperback!   

Amazon.com: An American Voice : The Silent Tyrants eBook : Marshall, CE, Marshall, Charles: Kindle Store


Follow me on X

Follow Me On Facebook

Monday, October 27, 2025

Great Article on Climate Change from the Free Press

Posted by CE Marshall from.....

The Free Press

I post this article by Ted Nordhaus because it's the first clear and calm explanation regarding climate change that has kept my attention with facts and addresses the hyperbole behind climate change.  It also delves somewhat into how the Silent Tyrants have been using it to control and dictate to the masses how they should live and what they should be concerned about.  The article is somewhat tedious as most academics tend to be, but there are several nuggets of truth that we all need to read. Enjoy!  

CE Marshall 



I Thought Climate Change Would End the World. I Was Wrong. My worldview was built on apocalyptic models sprung from faulty assumptions.  

By Ted Nordhaus 

 I used to argue that if the world kept burning fossil fuels at current rates, catastrophe was virtually assured. “The heating of the earth,” Michael Shellenberger and I wrote in our 2007 book, Break Through, “will cause the sea levels to rise and the Amazon to collapse and, according to scenarios commissioned by the Pentagon, will trigger a series of wars over the basic resources like food and water.” I no longer believe this hyperbole. 

      At the time, I, like most climate experts, thought that business-as-usual emissions would lead to around five degrees of warming by the end of this century. That assumption was never plausible. It assumed high population growth, high economic growth, and slow technological change. But fertility rates have been falling, global economic growth slowing, and the global economy decarbonizing for decades. Nor is there good reason to think that the combination of these three trends could possibly be sustained in concert. High economic growth is strongly associated with falling fertility rates. Technological change is the primary driver of long-term economic growth. A future with low rates of technological change is not consistent with high economic growth. And a future characterized by high rates of economic growth is not consistent with high rates of population growth. READ Steven Koonin: The Truth About Climate Change ‘Lies Somewhere in the Middle’ 

      As a result, most estimates of worst-case warming by the end of the century now suggest three degrees or less. But as the consensus has shifted, the reaction among much of the climate science and advocacy community has not been to become less catastrophic. Rather, it has five to three degrees been simply to shift the locus of catastrophe from of warming. This is all the more confounding given that the good news extends well beyond projections of long-term warming. Despite close to 1.5 degrees of warming over the last century, global mortality from climate and weather extremes has fallen by more than 96 percent on a per-capita basis. The world is on track this year for what is almost certainly the lowest level of climate-related mortality in recorded human history. Yes, the economic costs of climate extremes continue to rise, but this is almost entirely due to affluence, population growth, and the migration of global populations toward climate hazards: mainly cities in coastal regions and floodplains. So the far more interesting question is not why my colleagues and I at the Breakthrough Institute have revised our priors about climate risk, but why so many progressive environmentalists have not. 

      In the late 2000s, the climate advocacy community figured out that framing climate change as a future risk would not prove politically sufficient to transform the U.S. and global energy systems in the way that most believed necessary. And so the movement set about attempting to move the locus of climate catastrophe from the future to the present, framing extreme weather events not only as harbingers for future catastrophes, but as fueled by current climate change. But this narrative conflicts with existing evidence, including data collected by political scientist and former environmental studies professor Roger Pielke Jr. His work, going back to the mid-1990s, showed again and again that the normalized economic costs of climate related disasters, when adjusted for wealth and economic growth, weren’t increasing, despite the documented warming of the climate. 

     The reason for my shift in opinion wasn’t only that Pielke had produced strong evidence that undermined a key claim of the climate advocacy community. It wasn’t even witnessing Pielke’s cancellation, which was brutal. It was, rather, that I came to understand why you couldn’t find a climate change signal in the disaster loss data, despite close to 1.5 degrees of warming over the last century. There are two linked factors. First, what determines the cost of a climate-related disaster is not just how extreme the weather is. It is also how many people and how much wealth is affected by the extreme weather event, and how vulnerable they are to that event. Over the same period that the climate has warmed by 1.5 degrees, the global population has more than quadrupled, per-capita income has increased by a factor of 10, and the scale of infrastructure, social services, and technology that protects people and wealth from climate extremes has expanded massively. These latter factors overwhelm the climate signal. The amount of warming that is conceivable even in plausible worst-case scenarios is not remotely consistent with the sorts of catastrophic outcomes that I once believed in. Second, anthropogenic climate change is a much smaller factor at the local and regional scale than natural climate variability. Some climate scientists have pointed to anomalously high surface and ocean temperatures as evidence that warming may be accelerating, perhaps even faster than models have suggested. But even in the case where climate sensitivity proves to be relatively high, additional anthropogenic warming is an order of magnitude less than the oscillations of natural variability. The absence of an anthropogenic climate signal in most climate and weather phenomena is not paradoxical. It is simply not possible given the small amount of anthropogenic warming the planet has experienced.

      When scientists, journalists, and activists say that climate change made a given extreme event far more likely, what they are actually saying is that an event that is somewhat more intense than it would have been absent climate change could have been made so by climate change. To take the simplest example, a heat wave that is 1.5 degrees warmer than it would have been without climate change was made vastly more likely to occur due to climate change. The claim is tautological. Put these two factors together—the outsize influence that exposure and vulnerability have on the cost of extreme climate and weather phenomena, and the very modest intensification that climate change contributes to these events, when it plays any role at all—and what should be clear is that climate change is contributing very little to present-day disasters. This also means that the scale of anthropogenic climate change that would be necessary to very dramatically intensify those hazards is implausibly large. The amount of warming that is conceivable even in plausible worst-case scenarios, in other words, is not remotely consistent with the sorts of catastrophic outcomes that I once believed in. 

      For a long time, even after I came to this conclusion, I held on to the possibility of catastrophic climate futures based upon uncertainty. There might be tipping points: low-probability, high-consequence scenarios that aren’t factored into central estimates. The ice sheets could collapse much faster than we understand, or the Gulf Stream might shut down, bringing frigid temperatures to Western Europe, or permafrost and methane hydrates frozen in the seafloor might rapidly melt, accelerating warming. But once you look more closely at these risks, they don’t add up to catastrophic outcomes for humanity. While sensationalist news stories frequently refer to the collapse of the Gulf Stream, what they are really referring to is the slowing of the Atlantic Meridianol Overturning Circulation AMOC. The AMOC helps transport warm water to the North Atlantic and moderates winter temperatures across Western Europe. But its collapse, much less its slowing, would not result in a hard freeze across Europe. Indeed, under plausible conditions in which it might significantly slow, it would act as a negative feedback, counterbalancing warming, which is happening faster across the European continent than almost any place else in the world. Permafrost and methane hydrate thawing, meanwhile, are slow processes, not fast ones. Even irreversible melting would occur over millennial timescales—fast in geological terms but very slow in human terms. Likewise, even very accelerated scenarios for rapid melting of ice sheets would unfold over many centuries, not decades. Moreover, the problem with grounding strong precautionary claims in these known unknowns is that doing so demands strong remedies in the present in response to future risks that are unquantifiable, unfalsifiable, and low probability. 

      Why do so many smart people—scientists, engineers, lawyers, and public policy experts, all of whom will tell you that they “believe in science”—get the science of climate risk so badly wrong? The first reason is that highly educated people with high levels of science literacy are no less likely to get basic scientific issues wrong than anyone else when the facts conflict with their social identities and ideological commitments. Yale Law professor Dan Kahan has shown that people who are highly concerned about climate change actually have less accurate views about climate change overall than climate skeptics, and that this remains true even among partisans with high levels of education and general science literacy. Elsewhere, Kahan and others have demonstrated that on many issues, highly educated people are often more likely to hold stubbornly onto erroneous beliefs because they are adept at rationalizing their ideological commitments. The second reason is that there are strong incentives to overestimate climate risk if you make a living doing left-of-center climate and energy policy. The capture of Democratic and progressive politics by environmentalism over the last generation has been close to total. Meanwhile, the climate movement has effectively conflated consensus science about the reality and anthropogenic origins of climate change with catastrophist claims about climate risk, for which there is no consensus whatsoever. READ How China Hijacked America’s Climate Fears 

      Whether you are an academic researcher, a think-tank policy wonk, a program officer at an environmental or liberal philanthropy, or a Democratic congressional staffer, there is simply no incentive to challenge the central notion that climate change is an existential threat to the human future. And so everyone falls in line. Finally, there is a widespread belief that one can’t make a strong case for clean energy and technological innovation absent the catastrophic specter of climate change. This view ignores the entire history of modern energy innovation. Over the last two centuries, the world has moved inexorably from dirtier and more carbon-intensive technologies to cleaner ones. Burning coal, despite its significant environmental impacts, is cleaner than burning wood and dung. Burning gas is cleaner than coal. And, of course, producing energy with wind, solar, and nuclear is cleaner than doing so with fossil fuels. 

      There is no evidence whatsoever that 35 years of increasingly dire rhetoric and claims about climate change have had any effect on the rate at which the global energy system has decarbonized. In fact, by some measures, the world decarbonized more quickly over the 35 years prior to climate change’s emergence as a global concern than it has in the 35 years since. There are lots of good reasons to support cleaner energy without threatening the public with climate catastrophe. But the climate movement is actually after something different than that—a rapid and complete reorganization of the global energy economy over the course of a few decades. And there is no good reason to do that absent the specter of catastrophic climate change. And so that is what the climate movement and its supporters in academia, the media, and center-left political parties have offered for a generation. The insular climate discourse on the left may be cleverer than right-wing dismissals of climate change, but it is no less prone to issuing misleading claims, ignoring countervailing evidence, and demonizing dissent. What has resulted is a contemporary climate movement that is deeply out of touch with popular sentiment. 

 A version of this piece was originally published in The Ecomodernist. The Free Press earns a commission from any purchases made through all book links in this 

**Note loyal readers!  "The Silent Tyrants" in now availalable in its entirety on Kindle and soon paperback!   

Amazon.com: An American Voice : The Silent Tyrants eBook : Marshall, CE, Marshall, Charles: Kindle Store


Follow me on X

Follow Me On Facebook

Monday, October 20, 2025

No Kings Protest: It's all about control

 By CE Marshall


             King George III - A real king, a real tyrant 

     From work to politics- the "wrench in the works" of a prosperous society is the need for one person or a small group of people to control another group of people.  I cannot relate to this peculiar obsession but I'm understanding as I get older that it's at the core of what makes a tyrant or even a bad boss.  The leader of any situation in which he or she wants to control everyone is at the heart of tyranny.  

     In the media you also see a form of control, but much to their alarm, that control seems to be slipping through their fingers.  People who read and take a few moments to understand a given situation and then think for themselves will see things for what they are.  The media once had full control over what the public saw and then would use that power to "spoon feed" the narrative they wanted.  It worked for many years.  One could say it's been working since the Kennedy presidency when his murder was covered up and muddled by our government with the help of the media utilizing conspiracy theories and inuendo to prevent the truth from being known.   X and other social media platforms have removed "control" from the media and given more to the individual.  "You are the media now" is one of Elon Musk's favorite tag lines and I think he's correct.  It really doesn't take that long to understand a situation if you try thinking for yourself and asking questions.  The "No Kings" protests of this past weekend with all its angst and pronounced worries that we are losing our Democracy is an obvious "straw man" whereby they (and by "they" I mean the "Silent Tyrants" of our society.  The ruling elite.) create a boogeyman that doesn't exist and then orchestrate protests against that boogeyman.  This works on a lot of people from the ditch diggers to college professors suffering from "Trump Derangement Syndrome" so it's not hard to fill the streets with rabid lunatics.  What's missing is any explanation as to what they protest about.  During all conversations in the street with the old hippies and the blue haired girls a clear explanation was completely missing.  Not once did I hear a reasonable, coherent answer to the question "What are you protesting?" or "In what way has Trump behaved as a King or tyrant?".  It was like they were protesting just to protest- like window shopping or strolling through a park.  A stroll of sanctimonious screeching old fools and malcontents that cannot accept the consequences of an election they lost.   

     I will tell you what they were protesting, though.  They were protesting their inability to control the narrative of public policy through full control of the media and news.  The left has had this luxury for a long time, and it is slipping away very quickly.  They have no alternative but violence and feigned outrage over nothing.  May this be the beginning of the end for them and the beginning of the rights of mankind as individuals in society being given the respect and dignity they deserve.  

     The No Kings protesters need not demand the head of the king and an end to the tyranny they've imagined.   The Tyrant is right under their nose.  It is them.  


Follow me on X

Follow Me On Facebook